Reports
NOTE: STAC Reports vs STAC Benchmarks
 |
If an item has the STAC Report logo, it means that STAC has issued the report. |  |
If an item also has the Council logo, then the report is based on official benchmark specifications approved by the STAC Benchmark Council (i.e., actual STAC Benchmarks). |
STAC Report: Near Real-Time Position & Risk Management for a Large Set of Positions (GemFire 6.3 on HP blades)
STAC tested a system constructed by HP and Gemstone to demonstrate the benefits of a “data aware” data-grid architecture. The use case was position keeping on a set of equity options. The primary objective of the project was to subject the system to a realistic workload and compare the response times for end-user position requests when the system was configured two ways:
1. A traditional data grid, in which position calculations are performed on the compute-grid nodes
2. A configuration exploiting new GemFire features that enable calculations to be performed within the data grid.
STAC-M3 Report: kdb+ 2.6, Oracle Sun Fire X4540, OEL 5.4, ext3 (SUT: KDB100615)
STAC Report for:
- Kx Systems Kdb+ 2.6
- Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.4 with ext3
- AMD Opteron 2356, quad core, 2.3 GHz
- Oracle Sun Fire X4540 with 32 GB RAM
- Multiple SCSI disks / RAID 5
Tested against STAC-M3 v0.93 specs.
STAC-M2 HIGHLIGHTS: 29West LBM 3.6.1, Cisco UCS C200M1, Nehalem, 10GigE, SolarFlare, Cisco Catalyst 4900M (SUT: LBM100414)
STAC Report Highlights* for:
Informatica's 29West Latency Busters Messaging v3.6.1, RHEL AS v5.4, Cisco UCS C200 M1 Server, 2 x quad-core Intel Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz processors, Solarflare Solarstorm SFN5122F 10GigE Dual-Port NIC, Cisco Catalyst 4900-M 10GigE Switch
Tested against STAC-M2 v1.0 specs.
FULL STAC-M2 REPORT: 29West LBM 3.6.1, Cisco UCS C200M1, Nehalem, 10GigE, SolarFlare, Cisco Catalyst 4900M (SUT: LBM100414)
Full, detailed STAC Report for:
Informatica's 29West Latency Busters Messaging v3.6.1, RHEL AS v5.4, Cisco UCS C200 M1 Server, 2 x quad-core Intel Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz processors, Solarflare Solarstorm SFN5122F 10GigE Dual-Port NIC, Cisco Catalyst 4900-M 10GigE Switch
Tested against STAC-M2 v1.0 specs.
STAC-M2 HIGHLIGHTS: 29West LBM 3.6.1, Cisco UCS C200M1, Nehalem, 10GigE, SolarFlare, Cisco Nexus 5010 (SUT: LBM100402)
STAC Report Highlights* for:
Informatica's 29West Latency Busters Messaging v3.6.1, RHEL AS v5.4, Cisco UCS C200 M1 Server, 2 x quad-core Intel Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz processors, Solarflare Solarstorm SFN5122F 10GigE Dual-Port NIC, Cisco Nexus 5010 10GigE Switch
Tested against STAC-M2 v1.0 specs.
FULL STAC-M2 REPORT: 29West LBM 3.6.1, Cisco UCS C200M1, Nehalem, 10GigE, SolarFlare, Cisco Nexus 5010 (SUT: LBM100402)
Full, detailed STAC Report* for:
Informatica's 29West Latency Busters Messaging v3.6.1, RHEL AS v5.4, Cisco UCS C200 M1 Server, 2 x quad-core Intel Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz processors, Solarflare Solarstorm SFN5122F 10GigE Dual-Port NIC, Cisco Nexus 5010 10GigE Switch
Tested against STAC-M2 v1.0 specs.
STAC-M2 HIGHLIGHTS: IBM LLM 2.2 on RHEL 5.3, Xeon X5570, HS22, Voltaire/Mellanox QDR IB (SUT: LLM110905)
STAC Report Highlights* for:
IBM WebSphere MQ Low Latency Messaging v2.2.0.2, RHEL AS v5.3, IBM Bladecenter H, HS22 Blades, 2 x quad-core Intel Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz, Mellanox MT26428 ConnectX HCA, Voltaire 40Gb QDR InfiniBand Switch Module for IBM Bladecenter H
Tested against STAC-M2 v1.0 specs.
Latency Busters Messaging 3.3.9 with Cisco Catalyst 4900M 10GigE Switch and Solarflare NIC with OpenOnload
LBM 3.3.9, Novell SUSE Linux Enterpise Real Time 10 SP2 u3, IBM x3650, Intel Xeon Quad-Core X5355, Solarflare Communications 10GigE NIC with OpenOnload, and Cisco Catalyst 4900M
RMDS on IBM x3850 with 24-Core Intel Dunnington and Chelsio 10 GigE/TOE
RMDS 6.3, Novell SUSE Linux Enterpise 10 SP2, IBM x3850 M2, Intel Xeon Six-Core X7460, Chelsio 10GigE NIC with TOE enabled, and Cisco Catalyst 5020